humani nil a me alienum puto

random rants about news, the law, healthcare law, economics and anything I find amusing

Genius is Hard Work?

Freakonomics interviews David Shenk about his new book.  Mr. Shenk had some notable observations about genius and the work behind it.

[E]verything about talent is a process. There’s the genetic piece, and then there’s the ability piece. When you look very closely at [Michael] Jordan’s life, you see a rather ordinary teenage athlete with no particularly grand ambition until about mid-way through high school…After the deep disappointment of not making the varsity team, Jordan developed an unparalleled ambition that quite simply dwarfed that of his schoolmates in high school and later his teammates at the University of North Carolina. Jordan’s abilities developed according to what he demanded of himself.

The same is true of other super-achievers. From a distance, it looks like they’ve got something almost super-human about them. But when you look up close, at the moment-to-moment lives they lead, the sacrifices they make, the extraordinary resources they have around them, their abilities actually do make logical sense. If it’s documented closely enough, you can actually see how they went from mediocre to good, from good to great, from great to extraordinary.

He also gives some advice to parents that seem well put.  Persistence is more important than prodigy.  In fact, prodigy can box in young technical achievers into a comfort zone from which they will fear to emerge.  He says:

Show your kids how hard you work, how often you experience disappointments and how you respond to those disappointments. If you blame others for your failures or simply give up, that’s what your kids will learn. If you take on a long-term challenge, show a deep commitment to the process and a refusal to give up in the face of adversity, your kids will pick that up instead.

Filed under: Personal Posts, , , , , , ,

Alex Colville – painting just struck me…

via Colville_04.jpg (JPEG Image, 741×560 pixels).

Filed under: Personal Posts, , , ,

Haunting Images

I found this article interesting as it is local in flavor and surrounding what some might think is a morbid topic.  I disagree, and can see why dissection of a cadaver would be a central experience in the education of medical student. When I was in high school, I interned at the Cuyahoga County Morgue and observed an autopsy.  There I learned that Quincy (yeah, I’m that old and way before CSI) was not really how it worked.  I became an attorney, of course.

diss-colorCWRU’s Allen Memorial is putting on an exhibition of photos from a century or more ago showing medical students with their cadavers.  Many of the exhibits and photos are from the recently published book, Dissection, Photographs of a Rite of Passage in American Medicine 1880-1930 by James Edmonson from Case Western Reserve University and John Harley Warner from Yale University.  As is discussed in the link to the photo below, during this era there was limited access to cadavers for anatomical teaching.  So, learning, for many students, required a bit of self help.  We’ll leave it at that.  The link on the photo at left has some of these photos.

I find the photos fascinating.  Here we are, seeing photos of these student in the prime of their life exhibiting their anatomical subjects, that they treat well, humorously or in poor taste, but that all recently lost of the spark of life.  And these students, too, are now long, long since passed.  From the Plain Dealer article:

dissectionLong before “Tales from the Crypt ” “The Twilight Zone” and horror author Stephen King there were medical students.  Students who at the turn of the 19th-to-the-20th century posed for photos with bodies they had dissected in their studies; who gathered in groups around flesh-peeled cadavers and skulls like hunters displaying trophies…Dissection portraiture had its heyday from 1880 to 1930…The photos were a visual representation of a rite of passage dissection to a new identity a “boundary-crossing experience that left the participant forever changed ” as Warner wrote in the book…Back then there was no legal means of obtaining bodies for dissection. Some were unclaimed bodies but many were provided by grave-robbers known as “professional resurrectionists.” … Warner described most of the photos as almost “reverential” in the treatment of the subject some bearing such phrases written on the dissection tables as “Know Thyself ” “Man s usefulness endeth not with death” and “Her loss is our gain.” But he noted that others the gag photos and macabre images almost seem to revel in the transgression — posing human remains in outlandish poses or providing such accompanying table-epigraphs as “Such the vultures love ” “Rest in pieces” and “The Lord giveth We taketh away.”

via Case Western Reserve University’s Allen Memorial Medical Library displays ‘Haunting Images’ from a century ago – Metro –

Filed under: Bioethics, Health Law, Personal Posts, , , , ,

Princeton University – High-powered mathematicians take on free will

A favorite topic of my undergrad years — is there free will and if so where does it come from.  Interestingly, theoretical mathematicians and particle physicists are weighing in.  And if they are right, there is something fundamentally causally disconnected at the particle level.  In other words, uncertainty at the particle level might give rise to uncertainty on the macro level and a place for ‘free-will’ to exist.  John Conway and  Simon Kochen are working on a paper and presentations at Princeton that “will have one focus. [They are ]set on explaining …the tenets of their “Free Will Theorem.” The gist of it is this They say they have proved that if humans have free will then elementary particles — like atoms and electrons — possess free will as well. ”  They explain, “[i]t’s not about theories anymore — it s about what the universe does. And w’ve found that from moment to moment nature doesn’t know what it’s going to do. A particle has a choice.”

The smallest particles inside an atom have a property known as “spin.” And scientists have found that the spin of some particles may be related to the spin of other particles something known as “entanglement” and also known as the “twin” axiom. However an experimenter s choice of spin direction to measure cannot be communicated faster than the speed of light. This is the “fin” axiom. Looking at this sequence of facts the mathematicians have been able to extract the conclusion that if a human experimenter can make decisions independently of past events then the particle can also make a free choice.

via Princeton University – High-powered mathematicians take on free will.

Filed under: Personal Posts, , , , ,


April 2017
« Oct    

HealthCounsel Tweets